Thomas kuhn biography brevenal

Home / Scientists & Inventors / Thomas kuhn biography brevenal

Nor do they regard anomalous results as falsifying those theories. In this respect at least the accusation is wide of the mark. Kuhn could reply that such revisions are not revisions to the paradigm but to the non-paradigm puzzle-solutions provided by normal science. For that evolutionary account allows for an account of progress as the increasing extensive and sophisticated problem-solving power of science without requiring convergence on a unified, accurate, and complete description of nature.

7.5 Assessment

Assessing Kuhn’s significance presents a conundrum.

The social sciences in particular took up Kuhn with enthusiasm. The claim that the consensus of a disciplinary matrix is primarily agreement on paradigms-as-exemplars is intended to explain the nature of normal science and the process of crisis, revolution, and renewal of normal science.

thomas kuhn biography brevenal



Kuhn returned to Harvard after the war in Europe ended and graduated with a master’s degree in Physics in 1946 and doctorate in 1949. Kuhn 1992, 7). Thomas Kuhn. After agonizing over this, and talking to his father, he decided he could not sign. Indeed, since decision making is not rule-governed or algorithmic, there is no guarantee that those working within the same disciplinary matrix must agree on their evaluation of theory (1962/1970a, 200), although in such cases the room for divergence will be less than when the disputants operate within different disciplinary matrices.

Kuhn interviewed and taped Danish physicist Niels Bohr the day before Bohr's death. Scientific theories were popularly viewed as based entirely on inferences from observational evidence. Kuhn’s contrasting view is that we judge the quality of a theory (and its treatment of the evidence) by comparing it to a paradigmatic theory.

ISBN 0-226-45808-3

  • Kuhn, T.S. "The Function of Dogma in Scientific Research". Nelson 1993) have argued that the fact that the evidence, or, in Kuhn’s case, the shared values of science, do not fix a single choice of theory, allows external factors to determine the final outcome (see Martin 1991 and Schiebinger 1999 for feminist social constructivism).

    New York and London: Basic Books and Heineman, 1963. The standard positivist view was that observation provides the neutral arbiter between competing theories. This parallels (and indeed leads to) the no-overlap principle for kinds. It may however lose some qualitative, explanatory power [1970b, 20].) Hence we can say that revolutions do bring with them an overall increase in puzzle-solving power, the number and significance of the puzzles and anomalies solved by the revised paradigm exceeding the number and significance of the puzzles-solutions that are no longer available as a result of Kuhn-loss.

    Kuhn’s thesis of the theory-dependence of observation parallels related claims by realists. Fortunately, the prospect of an appointment at the University of California, Berkeley, appeared in early 1956, and in the spring he was offered an Assistant Professorship of the History of Science in the Departments of History and Philosophy.

    If much of normal science relies upon this piece of equipment, normal science will find it difficult to continue with confidence until this anomaly is addressed.