Thomas scott orangemane biography

Home / Celebrity Biographies / Thomas scott orangemane biography

1870),” in Dictionary of Canadian Biography, vol. Can., House of Commons, Report of the select committee on the causes of the difficulties in the North-West Territory in 1869–70 (Ottawa, 1874). Although the evidence is not completely conclusive, it seems clear that Scott did not disguise his contempt for the Métis. By mid-February 1870, he joined a contingent from Portage la Prairie—comprising about 50 armed men—who marched toward Fort Garry to reinforce anti-Riel forces and challenge the provisional government militarily, reflecting the party's militant stance against what they perceived as a rebellion thwarting confederation.[1] This expedition sought to rally Kildonan Scottish settlers but failed to gain broad support, leading to Scott's recapture on February 17, 1870, among 48 prisoners taken by Métis forces.[22][1]Scott's defiance during captivity, including threats to kill Riel if freed and refusals to pledge allegiance to the provisional government, exemplified the Canadian Party's unyielding commitment to Canadian federal control over negotiation or accommodation.[13] His alignment thus positioned him as a vocal insurgent within the party's broader campaign, which prioritized rapid integration into Canada to secure Protestant settler dominance amid demographic tensions with the Métis majority.[4]

Capture and Defiant Actions

Thomas Scott was captured on December 7, 1869, alongside 53 other individuals opposing Louis Riel's provisional government during the seizure of Upper Fort Garry.[1]He escaped on January 9, 1870, with fellow prisoners including Charles Mair, after nights of surreptitiously removing iron bars from their cell window using pocket knives, then fleeing to the pro-Canadian enclave at Portage la Prairie.[1][26]At Portage la Prairie, Scott joined efforts to rally armed resistance against the provisional government, participating in a subsequent march toward Fort Garry to challenge Métis control.[11][26]This expedition, comprising about 47 men under Major Charles Boulton, was intercepted by Métis forces, resulting in Scott's recapture on February 18, 1870.[1]In his second confinement at Upper Fort Garry, Scott displayed overt defiance toward his captors, insulting Métis guards and provoking them with contemptuous behavior that culminated in a beating on February 28, 1870.[1]He advocated for a prison breakout, issued threats of violence against Riel, and rejected the authority of the provisional government, conduct deemed insubordinate by the Métis tribunal.[11]

Trial and Execution

Provisional Government Proceedings

The provisional government of the Métis, established in late 1869 to assert control amid uncertainties over the transfer of Rupert's Land to Canada, resorted to military tribunals to address ongoing resistance from captured Canadian Party members.[1] On March 3, 1870, following Thomas Scott's recapture on February 17 after a failed escape and his subsequent provocation of guards through agitation and threats, an ad hoc Métis court-martial convened to try him.[1][27] Presided over by Ambroise-Dydime Lépine, the tribunal included Jean-Baptiste Lépine, André Nault, and Elzéar Goulet as members.[1]Scott faced charges of insubordination, insurrection, and rebellion against the provisional government's authority, stemming from his active role in prior attempts to overthrow it and his refusal to submit while imprisoned at Upper Fort Garry.[1][27] During the proceedings, Scott displayed open defiance, rejecting the tribunal's legitimacy and reportedly declaring his unyielding loyalty to British sovereign authority over Métis claims.[1] The trial operated as a summary military process without appointed counsel for the accused, formal evidentiary rules, or appeals mechanisms akin to British colonial jurisprudence, reflecting the provisional regime's emphasis on rapid order maintenance in a volatile settlement.[1][28]The tribunal convicted Scott by majority vote on the charges and imposed a death sentence, which Louis Riel reviewed and confirmed despite initial reservations about escalation.[1][27] This outcome underscored the provisional government's assertion of sovereign-like judicial power, though later critiques from Canadian authorities and Protestant communities framed the proceedings as lacking impartiality and due process, prioritizing suppression of dissent over equitable trial standards.[28] The sentencing directly preceded Scott's execution by Métis firing squad on March 4, 1870, outside Fort Garry's walls.[27]

Sentencing and Firing Squad

Thomas Scott appeared before a Métis court-martial convened by the provisional government on March 3, 1870, charged with insubordination, threats against his captors, and prior escape attempts.[29] The panel, consisting of Métis council members including Ambroise-Dominique Lépine, found him guilty and sentenced him to death by firing squad as a deterrent against further resistance.[29][30] Louis Riel, as president of the provisional government, reviewed and approved the verdict, deeming execution necessary to suppress ongoing agitation from Canadian prisoners.[29]On March 4, 1870, Scott was marched from his cell in Upper Fort Garry to an open area nearby for execution.[30] A firing squad of eight Métis men, some reportedly under the influence of alcohol, carried out the sentence.[31] The initial volley struck Scott but did not prove immediately fatal; he remained conscious, groaning and attempting to speak.[31] A second round of shots was fired to dispatch him, after which his body was placed in a rough coffin—accounts from observers noted signs of lingering life—and buried in an unmarked grave outside the fort.[31][30] The hasty and botched procedure reflected the provisional government's limited resources and the improvised nature of its judicial processes.[31]

Political Fallout

Public Outrage in Protestant Canada

The execution of Thomas Scott on March 4, 1870, provoked intense public indignation across Protestant-dominated regions of Canada, particularly in Ontario, where news arrived by late March via refugees and reports from the Red River Settlement.[13] Protestants, including members of the Orange Order, framed the event as a sectarian outrage against a loyal British subject and zealous Orangeman, amplifying existing anti-Catholic and anti-Métis sentiments rooted in historical Orange-Irish Catholic rivalries.[1][24] Initial reports failed to generate immediate mass fury, prompting organized efforts by groups like Canada First—comprising Protestant nationalists such as Charles Mair and William Denison—to stage "indignation meetings" and publicize Scott's death as a deliberate murder by "half-breed French Catholics," thereby manufacturing broader outrage through sympathetic newspapers.[13][32]In Ontario's legislature, the predominantly Protestant assembly responded swiftly on March 24, 1870, by passing resolutions condemning Louis Riel and his provisional government, and authorizing a bounty of £2,000 (equivalent to about $5,500 in contemporary terms) for Riel's capture, reflecting the depth of provincial anger and demands for retribution.[24] Orange lodges and Protestant communities held rallies decrying the execution as an assault on British Protestant values, with Scott elevated to martyr status in pamphlets and sermons that emphasized his defiance as a defense of loyalty against rebellion.[13] This reaction was fueled by Scott's known Orangeman affiliations and his vocal anti-Catholic stance, which resonated with Ontario's Ulster Protestant heritage and fears of French-Canadian or Métis dominance in the West.[1] Public discourse often invoked biblical parallels of martyrdom, while editorials in Toronto and Kingston papers called for military invasion to avenge the "cold-blooded murder" and suppress the Métis.[13][28]The outrage extended beyond rhetoric, contributing to volunteer enlistments for expeditions against Riel, though federal caution tempered immediate action; nonetheless, it solidified Protestant Canada's perception of the Red River Resistance as a Catholic-Métis threat to Confederation's Protestant character.[24] Religious leaders and Orange grand masters publicly mourned Scott, linking his fate to broader struggles against "papal influence" in Canadian affairs, a narrative that persisted in loyalist historiography despite critiques of Scott's own provocative behavior during captivity.[13] This provincial fervor pressured Prime Minister John A.

Macdonald's government, highlighting fractures between Ontario's aggressive Protestant unionism and Quebec's more conciliatory Catholic views on Riel.[32]

Federal Military Intervention

The execution of Thomas Scott on March 4, 1870, ignited intense public fury in Ontario, where Protestant communities viewed it as a Métis affront to British loyalty and rule of law, prompting widespread calls for Ottawa to dispatch troops against Riel's provisional government.[33] This backlash, amplified by Scott's Orangeman affiliations and reports of his defiant stance, pressured Prime Minister John A.

Macdonald's administration to accelerate plans for asserting federal control over the Red River Settlement, shifting from diplomatic negotiations to coercive enforcement.[34]On April 16, 1870, the Canadian government formally authorized the expedition, tasking Colonel Garnet Wolseley with assembling and leading a force to suppress the resistance, arrest Riel and his associates, and facilitate the transfer of Rupert's Land from the Hudson's Bay Company to Canada.[33] The contingent comprised roughly 1,200 personnel, blending 400 British regulars from the 1st Battalion of the 60th Rifles with 800 Canadian volunteers and militia drawn primarily from Ontario and Quebec, equipped for a grueling overland trek amid spring thaws and logistical challenges.[34] Wolseley departed Toronto on May 28, 1870, navigating via the Great Lakes to Thunder Bay before a 900-mile portage-heavy route through rugged terrain, reaching Fort Garry on August 24 after 93 days of hardship that tested the force's discipline but incurred no combat losses en route.[34]By the time of arrival, Riel had fled to the United States on August 23, evading capture, allowing the expedition to occupy Upper Fort Garry without resistance and dismantle the provisional government's structures.[34] The intervention solidified federal authority, enabling the Manitoba Act's implementation on July 15, 1870, which admitted the province into Confederation with protections for Métis land rights, though it also sparked reprisals against Métis communities by Ontario settlers within the force.[34] While averting immediate civil war, the operation underscored Ottawa's prioritization of central control over local autonomies, with Wolseley's troops garrisoning the region until 1871 to prevent resurgence.[34]

Historical Significance

Catalyst for Manitoba's Formation

The execution of Thomas Scott on March 4, 1870, by a Métis tribunal under Louis Riel's provisional government provoked widespread outrage across English-speaking Canada, particularly in Ontario, where Protestant and Orange Order communities viewed it as a murder of a loyal British subject.[24][35] This reaction intensified demands for federal intervention against the Red River Resistance, transforming a localized Métis assertion of rights into a national crisis that threatened the Dominion's expansion into the Northwest.[11] Prime Minister John A.

Macdonald, facing pressure from Ontario politicians and newspapers decrying the act as "cold-blooded murder," accelerated diplomatic efforts to negotiate with Riel's council while preparing military reinforcements.[13][28]Scott's death acted as the pivotal catalyst by underscoring the provisional government's willingness to enforce authority through capital punishment, which alienated potential Canadian sympathizers and compelled Ottawa to prioritize rapid territorial incorporation to avert further violence or Métis independence.[28][1] In response, Canada dispatched a 1,200-man expedition under Colonel Garnet Wolseley in May 1870, but en route, negotiations yielded the List of Rights from Riel's delegates, incorporating demands for bilingualism, land grants to Métis heads of families (1.4 million acres reserved), and provincial status.[36] These terms formed the basis of the Manitoba Act, assented to on May 12, 1870, which created Manitoba as Canada's fifth province with a small initial territory of 18,000 square miles, distinct from the larger unorganized territories of the Northwest.[35][1]Without the execution's shock value, the Resistance might have protracted into stalemate or escalated into open war, delaying confederation of the Hudson's Bay Company territories; instead, it forced a compromise that balanced Métis safeguards against Canadian sovereignty, though Wolseley's arrival on August 24, 1870, dispersed Riel's forces and triggered Métis flight.[11][28] The Act's passage marked the first post-Confederation province carved from acquired lands, establishing a precedent for federal oversight in Indigenous-settler negotiations while embedding sectional tensions that fueled later conflicts.[1]

Martyrdom in Loyalist Narratives

In Protestant communities across Ontario, particularly among members of the Orange Order, Thomas Scott's execution on March 4, 1870, by Louis Riel's provisional government transformed him into a symbol of steadfast loyalty to the British Crown and Protestant values.

Almost immediately a Métis court martial decided to execute Boulton, but Riel was persuaded to spare his life in return for a promise from Smith that he would do all in his power to evoke support for the provisional government.

Outside the walls of Upper Fort Garry the emergency seemed to be over. To ignore Scott’s challenge might be seen as weakness.

Critics argued the removal overlooked his role as a symbol of resistance against Métis provisional rule, while others contended the hall's namesake did not warrant preservation given Scott's provocative actions during the conflict.[37][50] No other major statues, plaques, or public monuments dedicated to Scott are documented in Manitoba or elsewhere in Canada as of 2025.[37]Commemorations of Scott have primarily occurred within Orange Order circles, including a 1900 memorial medal issued by the Winnipeg lodge to mark the construction of the hall.

External links

SCOTT, THOMAS, adventurer; b. c. 1842, probably at Clandeboye, County Down (Northern Ireland); d. 4 March 1870 at Red River (Man.).

Almost nothing is known of the early life of Thomas Scott, whose death during the Red River disturbance of 1869–70 provoked a storm of English-French hostility in central Canada.

Morton, History of the Canadian west. Information to be used in other citation formats:

Permalink:  https://www.biographi.ca/en/bio/scott_thomas_1870_9E.html
Author of Article:   J. E. Rea
Title of Article:   SCOTT, THOMAS (d.

We may accurately describe the action as mistaken, but only from hindsight.

Scott, an obscure if volatile figure during his life, became a cause célèbre after death. Constructed in 1902 by the local chapter of the Orange Order, the building served as a fraternal hall for the Protestant organization of which Scott was a member, honoring his execution by Louis Riel's provisional government on March 4, 1870, during the Red River Resistance.[48][49] The hall symbolized Scott's status as a martyr in Orange and Protestant Canadian narratives, particularly among Ontario loyalists who viewed his death as an affront to British authority.[37]In 2020, the City of Winnipeg demolished the structurally unstable building, sparking debate over the erasure of historical commemoration tied to Scott's polarizing legacy.

thomas scott orangemane biography

In the summer of 1869 Scott arrived at Red River and found employment as a labourer on the “Dawson Road” project, a new wagon road connecting Red River to Lake Superior, under Superintendent John Allan Snow* [see Simon James Dawson*]. Grand Lodge resolutions in 1870 condemned his killing as a "cruel murder," emphasizing his membership and portraying the execution as an assault on the Order's principles of civil and religious liberty.

Now out of work, he drifted around Upper Fort Garry (Winnipeg) and fell under the influence of John Christian Schultz*, leader of the Canadian party, a small Anglophone group which promoted the annexation of Red River to Canada. The more extreme reaction may be seen in a resolution of Toronto Orangemen carried by the Globe on 13 April 1870: “Whereas Brother Thomas Scott, a member of our Order was cruelly murdered by the enemies of our Queen, country and religion, therefore be it resolved that . . .

Except for the irreconcilables among the Canadians, the people of Red River were prepared to allow Riel’s provisional government, which would be broadly representative, to effect a settlement with Ottawa. Begg, Red River journal (Morton). A.-H.