Ludwig wittgenstein major works

Home / Scientists & Inventors / Ludwig wittgenstein major works

What enables language to function and therefore must be accepted as “given” are precisely forms of life. Such liberation involves elimination of the need to posit any sort of external or internal authority beyond the actual applications of the rule.

These considerations lead to PI 201, often considered the climax of the issue: “This was our paradox: no course of action could be determined by a rule, because every course of action can be made out to accord with the rule.

What is left for the philosopher to do, if traditional, or even revolutionary, propositions of metaphysics, epistemology, aesthetics, and ethics cannot be formulated in a sensical manner? As a matter of fact, Wittgenstein was acutely aware of the contrast between the two stages of his thought, suggesting publication of both texts together in order to make the contrast obvious and clear.

Still, it is precisely via the subject of the nature of philosophy that the fundamental continuity between these two stages, rather than the discrepancy between them, is to be found.

One of the natural outcomes of such intense investigation is the awareness that, indeed, understanding Wittgenstein means recognizing other times and other developments, such as before the early Wittgenstein (of the Tractatus), between the early Wittgenstein and the later Wittgenstein (of Philosophical Investigations), and following that later Wittgenstein.

The middle Wittgenstein, he of the period between the early Wittgenstein and the later Wittgenstein, was, early on, identified as worthy of exposure and more interpretative work, but such a venture was clearly a function of two mutually impactful grand questions: What is the relationship between the early and later Wittgenstein (as adumbrated in 2.4 and 3.8) and, following upon answers to that question, what is then the more exact time-frame that is worthy of the independent label “middle”?

He retreated to isolation in Norway, for months at a time, in order to ponder these philosophical problems and to work out their solutions.

1, G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright (eds.), G. E. M. Anscombe (trans.), vol. There is also the option that phenomenology appears exclusively in the middle Wittgenstein. (Part II (PPF), focusing on philosophical psychology, perception etc., was different, pointing to new perspectives (which, undoubtedly, are not disconnected from the earlier critique) in addressing specific philosophical issues.

The complex edifice of the Tractatus is built on the assumption that the task of logical analysis was to discover the elementary propositions, whose form was not yet known. After the Investigations

It has been submitted that the writings of the period from 1946 until his death (1951) constitute a distinctive phase of Wittgenstein’s thought.

The limit can … only be drawn in language and what lies on the other side of the limit will be simply nonsense” (TLP Preface). Propositions which do have sense are bipolar; they range within the truth-conditions drawn by the truth-tables. This reading has been challenged, in turn, by several interpretations (such as Baker and Hacker 1984, McGinn1984, and Cavell 1990), while others have provided additional, fresh perspectives (e.g., Diamond, “Rules: Looking in the Right Place” in Phillips and Winch 1989, and several in Miller and Wright 2002).

Directly following the rule-following sections in PI, and therefore easily thought to be the upshot of the discussion, are those sections called by interpreters “the private-language argument.” Whether it be a veritable argument or not (and Wittgenstein never labeled it as such), these sections point out that for an utterance to be meaningful it must be possible in principle to subject it to public standards and criteria of correctness.

This strategy is adopted, for example, by the Hintikkas (1986b) regarding the year 1929 or by Kienzler (1997) concerning a transitional break in 1931. Such boundaries and exactness are the definitive traits of form—be it Platonic form, Aristotelian form, or the general form of a proposition adumbrated in the Tractatus. Objects combine with one another according to their logical, internal properties.

As early as 1933 (The Blue Book) Wittgenstein took pains to challenge these conceptions, arriving at the insight that “if we had to name anything which is the life of the sign, we should have to say that it was its use” (BB 4). It is an activity of clarification (of thoughts), and more so, of critique (of language).

. He volunteered to serve in the Austrian army at the outbreak of World War I, and in 1918 was captured and sent to a prison camp in Italy, where he finished his masterpiece, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, one of the most important philosophical works of all time. The anti-theoretical stance is reminiscent of the early Wittgenstein, but there are manifest differences.