Herbert hoover presidency in debt
Home / Political Leaders & Public Figures / Herbert hoover presidency in debt
After his election in 1928, but before assuming the presidency, Hoover embarked on a ten-week tour of Latin America during which he delivered twenty-five speeches, almost all of which stressed his plans to reduce American political and military interference in Latin American affairs. These encampments became symbols of the failure of Hoover's policies to address the needs of the destitute.
Moreover, Hoover’s attempts at economic recovery were often undermined by political pressure from both sides of the aisle.
His response to the Great Depression was met with mixed reactions, as opponents criticized his methods while supporters argued for the necessity of his actions. This debate would reappear in American foreign policy circles throughout the 1930s.
Hoover Moratorium
By mid-1931, the Great Depression was being felt throughout Europe.
By offering loans to struggling businesses, Hoover hoped to stabilize these sectors and prevent widespread bankruptcies.
The RFC was authorized to lend up to $2 billion to financial institutions and businesses, a substantial sum at the time. Stimson grew frustrated that even this provocation failed to move Hoover to more decisive action, though the Secretary of State largely kept his thoughts private.
The dam's construction began in 1931 and became a symbol of Hoover’s commitment to using government resources for public benefit.
Hoover's public works initiatives extended beyond the Hoover Dam. He advocated for substantial investment in infrastructure, including roads, bridges, and public buildings. According to economic historians, the tariff contributed to a contraction in global trade that worsened the Great Depression, with trade volumes falling by approximately two-thirds between 1929 and 1934.
Additionally, the tariff's impact on consumer prices was significant.
He amassed a considerable fortune, which established his reputation as a self-made man.
The market crash in October 1929, moreover, weakened an already shaky global economic order. Hoover, who took office in 1929, faced an economy that was rapidly deteriorating, and his response was characterized by a mix of traditional economic theory and a belief in limited government intervention.
The RFC was a pivotal component of his economic strategy, designed to provide financial assistance to banks, railroads, and other large industries. This article delves into Hoover's economic strategies, the challenges he faced from political adversaries, and the evolving perception of his legacy in the context of American history.
Herbert Hoover: A Historical Context
Herbert Hoover, the 31st President of the United States, is a figure often associated with the onset of the Great Depression, a period that reshaped the American economic landscape and its political structure.
The President, fearful that the United States might become embroiled in a military conflict in Asia, wanted to reduce the nation's profile there. Critics argued that the RFC's actions did little to alleviate the suffering of the average American, as the focus remained on stabilizing big businesses rather than providing direct relief to the unemployed.
Despite its limitations, the RFC played a crucial role in the recovery of the banking system.
Hoover manned the telephone and lobbied other leaders via the new transatlantic line and managed to assemble support for the moratorium from 15 nations by July 6. However, as the Great Depression took hold, the perception of his leadership changed dramatically. His administration also attempted to bolster public confidence through initiatives such as the Reconstruction Finance Corporation (RFC), established in 1932, which aimed to provide financial support to banks and businesses.
However, the aftermath of the tariff was largely negative.
The Smoot-Hawley Tariff raised duties on over 20,000 imported goods to historically high levels.
His steadfast commitment to traditional economic principles and reluctance to embrace more radical measures led to accusations of indifference. In January 1932, as Japanese forces occupied the southern Manchurian city of Chinchou, Stimson drafted a diplomatic note warning the Japanese that the United States would not accept any treaty resolving the Manchurian crisis which violated existing treaties such as the Kellogg-Briand Pact; in essence, Stimson's note, which came to be known as the Stimson Doctrine—even though President Hoover was its intellectual author—meant that the United States would not recognize Japan's territorial gains in Manchuria.