George silver biography

Home / Celebrity Biographies / George silver biography

He dismissed their methods as "juggling gambols" and "apish devices," claiming they relied on deceptive demonstrations that ignored true defensive principles and encouraged unsafe, linear advances over the adaptable footwork essential for survival. He deems this prohibition of thrusting an "evil tradition" in his "Paradoxes of Defence" and believes that both cut and thrust should be used.

See also

External links

Schools that teach Silver's swordsmanship

Persondata
NameSilver, George
Alternative names
Short descriptionBritish fencer and martial arts author
Date of birth
Place of birth
Date of death>1622
Place of deathLondon
Categories:
  • British fencers
  • Historical fencing
  • 17th-century deaths
  • People of the Tudor period
  • 17th-century English people
  • 17th-century writers
  • English writers
  • 16th-century births
  • 16th-century writers
  • 16th-century English people

George Silver

George Silver (fl.

Alongside his brother Toby, Silver issued a formal challenge for a public fencing match at ten weapons, starting with single rapier and rapier and dagger, to be held at the Bell Savage inn near Saviolo's school; the challenge was disseminated via five or six score (100 to 120) printed broadsides posted from Southwark to Westminster, drawing crowds of supporters for organized demonstrations outside Italian salles.

(From Wikipedia)

More about George Silver: 

Books by George Silver:

Find more by George Silver at your library, or elsewhere.

George Silver

This article is about the English swordsman. Italian masters, arriving in London during the 1570s and 1590s, attracted aristocratic patronage with their elegant but thrusting-oriented styles, charging exorbitant fees—up to £100 per lesson—that excluded middle-class English practitioners and exacerbated resentment among native masters who viewed these methods as degenerate and overly dangerous.[12][2]George Silver positioned himself as a defender of English styles amid this rivalry, particularly targeting Italian masters like Rocco Bonetti, who arrived in London in the 1570s and established a fencing school in Blackfriars by 1584.

62

  • S. Master of Defence: The Works of George Silver. He is thought to have been the eldest of four brothers (one of whom, Toby, was also a swordsman who accompanied his brother in at least one challenge), and eleventh in descent from Sir Bartholomew Silver, who was knighted by Edward II.[1] He married a woman named Mary Haydon in London, in 1580 (1579 in the old calendar then in use in England).

    The fencing historian Aylward claims that he was alive in 1622, when he was visited (a kind of audit of people claiming noble or gentlemanly status) by Cooke, Clarenceux King-of-Arms.[2] However, Robert Cooke died in 1593. 19

  • He promoted the use of the backsword, sword and buckler, or two-handed sword, emphasizing their ability to integrate powerful cuts, thrusts, and defensive actions seamlessly.

    1550s–1620s) was a gentleman of England during the late 16th and early 17th centuries, who is known for his writings on swordplay. Bref Instructions, however, remained an unpublished manuscript until its publication in 1898 by fencing historian Captain Cyril G. R. Matthey as a training manual to aid soldiers fighting in the Boer War.

    Silver recommends a highly dynamic system which he deemed suitable for duelling, street defence and the battlefield, rather than the purely duelling orientation of the rapier.

    A major difference between Silver's system and Italian rapier fencing lies in his not advocating the use of the lunge but rather the use of a gathering step, the normal fencing step in which the feet do not pass, or a full passing step in which they do, to come into range to strike the opponent, followed by instantly "flying out" again.

    george silver biography

    The Works of George Silver. 66

  • George Silver, Paradoxes of Defence, London 1599, p. By decrying the rapier as a foreign corruption that weakened traditional strengths—labeling Englishmen as "strong men, but had no cunning"—Silver framed its adoption as a disgraceful erosion of national martial identity.[9]Among Silver's specific paradoxes was the superiority of off-hand weapons like the buckler over empty-hand parries in rapier fighting.

    The manuscript is undated but refers to the "nation of Great Britain" and so must have been written after James I's introduction of that term in late 1604. 1

  • George Silver, Paradoxes of Defence, London 1599, pp. Silver also bemoans other weapons that do not offer sufficient protection to the user (such as daggers; the rapier, however bears the brunt of his attention, as it was seemingly quite common in the day.

    He later (probably around 1605) wrote his Brief Instructions on my Paradoxes of Defence in which he explained some of his method for using his preferred weapons (he recommends the shorter backsword as being more versatile and offering better defence than the rapier).

    He was the eldest of four brothers in a family of gentlemen, with at least one sibling, Toby Silver, noted for his proficiency in swordsmanship.[4]During the Tudor period, the Silver family exemplified the landed gentry of England, a class of landowners who held social prestige without the full obligations of nobility.

    Unlike the argumentative tone of Paradoxes, this manuscript shifts toward actionable content, making it a key resource for understanding Silver's vision of English martial techniques.[16]The core of the manuscript consists of detailed instructions on fundamental elements of fencing with English weapons, particularly the sword and dagger.

    It covers various guards, such as the true guardant and bastard guardant wards, along with grips and maneuvers for close combat, including how to cross blades, use the dagger to deflect, and execute fights from specific positions.