Juror 7 biography examples

Home / Biography Templates & Examples / Juror 7 biography examples

We've got this kid Modjelewski in there."

Juror #7 knows full well that he doesn't care about the verdict, but at least in the beginning, he pretends to be offended when someone questions his motives. Another Juror, Juror 6, tries to open the window, as Juror 7 tells him that it's supposed to be the hottest day of the year. He tells them he wrote the ad copy, "The breakfast with the built-in bounce."

Juror 1 asks 8 why he has his doubts, and then asks each juror to say why he thinks the defendant is guilty.

By the midway point of the movie, #7 has started saying stuff like, "Do me a favor. Jurors are expected to be impartial and fair, and any indication that they are not could result in a mistrial or other serious consequences.

Overall, Juror No. 7 is a term that highlights the importance of having qualified and unbiased individuals serving on juries.

We are going to be thinking about the court case not in terms of the actual performances of the lawyers, but from the perspective of those who have a backstage role in the court process, the jury.

Even if the viewer is not up to speed on all the expository details of the case from the start, the stakes are high. "Didn't they say something about a fight, an argument between the old man and his son around about 7:00 that night?" he says.

He deals with the facts of the case logically and concretely.

5th Juror works in a Harlem hospital and says that he himself has lived in the slums his entire life. Juror 3 suggests that he thinks it's an open-and-shut case, but they insisted on talking a lot. You know, born in a slum, mother dead since he was 9. He then points out the Woolworth Building and notes that it's strange he's never been inside.

Juror 7 talks to Juror 10, who has a hot-weather cold, before going to Juror 1, the jury foreman, and telling him to start the meeting, even though there's someone in the bathroom.

11 of them raise their hands saying they think the defendant is guilty, but Juror 8 does not. He sticks up for 9th Juror, an old man, and seems to be a respectful man.

7th Juror’s main concern in the case is whether or not it will end before his ball game, for which he has tickets. Instead, his decision necessitates that they have a lengthy discussion about their respective beliefs.

Juror 8 is resistant to agreeing with his fellow jurors not because he is sure that the boy did not commit the crime he is alleged to have committed, but because he is ambivalent, unsure, and cautious about going along with the prevailing opinion just for the sake of it.

8 wants to entertain the possibility that they are wrong, and suggests that they should take an hour, since the baseball game he wants to watch doesn't start until 8 o'clock.

The rest of the jurors agree to sit in the room for an hour. He then stands and suggests that the boy was a born liar, which angers 9, who says that no one has a monopoly on the truth.

When Juror 1 tells them they ought to sit in numerical order around the table, there is already indecision, with some men suggesting that it makes no difference where they sit. I'm changing my vote to not guilty." So in other words, he's totally willing to admit to the whole room that he doesn't care if the defendant is guilty or innocent.

Let's break it up and go home. Because he's been hit on the head by somebody once a day, every day. While all of the jurors, different though they may be, raise their hands suggesting that they think the defendant is guilty, he stays quiet. As a jury of 12 men assembles, the judge tells them that they have examined a case of first degree premeditated murder, and that they must now deliberate to come up with a verdict.

We see the members of the jury as the judge tells them, "If...there's no reasonable doubt, then you must, in good conscience, find the accused guilty." He then tells them that their verdict must be unanimous.